TV

Is Game of Thrones' Most Honorable Character Actually to Blame For Civil War?

Is Game of Thrones' Most Honorable Character Actually to Blame For Civil War?
Image credit: HBO

Wait, what?

The Game of Thrones is a popular television series that depicts the political struggles and power plays among the noble families of Westeros.

However, an interesting theory has been circulating online that the entire war was Ned Stark's fault.

The idea is that Ned Stark, the righteous Lord of Winterfell, is responsible for every tragic event that has occurred on Game of Thrones.

It all started when Eddard accepted the role of Hand of the King. Ned's sense of honor and duty led him to investigate the death of his predecessor, Jon Arryn.

Fans note that Eddard had to hire a professional assassin to get rid of Daenerys. However, it was the Lord of Winterfell who tried to stop these machinations, taking pity on the defenseless child.

In the end, it was the Mother of Dragons who led her army and razed King's Landing to the ground.

Another mistake caused the instant death of the hero of the North. Ned learned that all of Cersei's children were not the king's, but the queen's brother Jaime's.

And instead of immediately informing his best friend Robert of these circumstances, the Lord of Winterfell once again chose to act honestly, giving Cersei and her heir time to escape.

It seems to fans that if Eddard had chosen another options, not only would he still be alive, but so would Catelyn, Robb, and the rest of House Stark.

In addition to the northern family, thousands of people died or were caught up in a civil war that led to the collapse of Westeros.

The world of Game of Thrones has no tolerance for honor, courage, or bravery. The basic qualities necessary for survival are cunning planning and guile.

However, the beloved figure of the first season was a true knight, and innocent souls paid the price for his role. Although many fans agree with this interpretation of events, other viewers continue to defend their favorite character.

The audience is faced with the classic story twist: can a hero kill one person to save a thousand? Probably not.

Source: Reddit