Movies

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good
Image credit: Legion-Media

The ups, downs, and corkscrews of these characters will leave you questioning your own moral compass.

1. Cersei Lannister from Game of Thrones ( 2011–2019)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 1

First up, we have our Queen of Mean, Cersei Lannister. Her actions are often so villainous that you can't help but applaud her audacity. We're talking blowing up a significant portion of King's Landing with wildfire levels of audacity. That's not just a barbecue gone wrong, folks, that's a full-on 'honey, I obliterated the neighborhood' scenario. And yet, her ruthless pursuit of power and fierce protection of her children are almost... admirable? While we definitely wouldn't recommend her parenting book, there's no denying that her devilish charm and cunning made her a compelling anti-hero.

2. Benjamin Ben Linus from Lost (2004–2010)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 2

Ben Linus, the weasel-faced character you love to hate. Sure, he manipulated, lied, and murdered his way around the island, but he did it with such panache, you couldn't help but root for him sometimes. Behind those creepy eyes and that sinister smile was a man who believed he was doing what was necessary for the greater good of the island. Morally misguided? Absolutely. Chaotically good? Eh, maybe on alternate Tuesdays.

3. Boyd Crowder from Justified ( 2010–2015)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 3

Boyd Crowder, the charming criminal mastermind from Justified, was the epitome of chaotic evil – with a side of good old Southern hospitality. Whether he was robbing banks, detonating bombs, or attempting to control Harlan County's criminal underworld, he did it all with a poetic flair that somehow softened the blow of his actions. Like a Shakespearian villain, you may not have agreed with his methods, but dang, did he make villainy look good.

4. Crowley from Supernatural ( 2005–2020)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 4

Imagine a king – now imagine he rules Hell. That's Crowley. But unlike most villains, Crowley became a fan favorite due to his snappy one-liners and surprisingly human moments. He's the devil you'd like to have a drink with, not because he's a good guy, but because he's a wickedly fun character. The fact that he occasionally helped our heroes, the Winchester brothers, just adds to his chaotic goodness.

5. Marlo Stanfield from The Wire (2002–2008)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 5

'Sounds like one of them good problems.' This classic Marlo Stanfield line encapsulates the man perfectly – utterly ruthless, yet oddly pragmatic. As the head of a drug-dealing empire, Marlo does some unspeakable things. But beneath the ice-cold exterior is a man who simply wants to play the game and come out on top. His cutthroat ambition, his strategic mind, and his refusal to bow down to anyone make him oddly compelling. It's as if Gordon Gekko took a wrong turn on Wall Street and ended up in Baltimore's drug trade.

6. Tony Soprano from The Sopranos ( 1999-2007)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 6

How could we not mention the poster boy of morally ambiguous characters – Tony Soprano? A loving family man on one hand and a ruthless mob boss on the other. The blend of brutality and vulnerability in his character made viewers root for him, even when he was doing terrible things. He was the embodiment of chaotic good within an evil profession. Struggling with anxiety attacks and a complicated family life, Tony showed that even mobsters have feelings. You wouldn't want to meet him in a dark alley, but you might tune in to watch him every Sunday night.

7. Petyr 'Littlefinger' Baelish from Game of Thrones (2011–2017)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 7

'Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder.' Spoken like a true agent of chaos, Littlefinger. This guy was the definition of a schemer. While he may not have been physically intimidating, his machinations, plots, and political maneuvering made him a formidable character. Despite his self-serving nature and unquenchable thirst for power, Littlefinger did contribute to some moments of poetic justice. His involvement in Joffrey's death? That was for the team.

8. Frank Underwood from House of Cards (2013–2018)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 8

Ah, Frank Underwood, a man who would push you in front of a subway train if it helped him climb the political ladder – oh wait, he actually did that. Underwood's journey from Majority Whip to the President of the United States was littered with underhanded tactics and criminal activities. But as he broke the fourth wall to confide in us, his charisma and cunning almost made you feel like an accomplice in his political ascent. His Machiavellian methods were dark, but you had to appreciate his strategic brilliance.

9. Gustavo 'Gus' Fring from Breaking Bad ( 2008–2013)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 9

Here's a guy who managed a multi-million-dollar meth operation while maintaining a front as a mild-mannered fast-food entrepreneur. Gus Fring was as cold and calculated as they come. He was a methodical villain, but his motivations were grounded in business, not sadism. Plus, his revenge on the Cartel was a delicious dish served cold. So, while you might not want him as a business partner, you wouldn't mind him planning your enemy's downfall.

10. Al Swearengen from Deadwood (2004–2006)

10 Television Characters So Evil, They're Almost Chaotic Good - image 10

Lastly, we have Al Swearengen, a man who could out-cuss a sailor and out-scheme a fox. As a saloon owner in the lawless town of Deadwood, Al was often the cause of the chaos. But in a twisted way, he was also a stabilizing force, maintaining a semblance of order in the otherwise wild west. His methods might have been brutal, but his intentions weren't entirely selfish. He was a man willing to do evil for the greater good – or at least, what he considered the greater good.